A Comparative Study of the Development of National Press Systems in the Former Soviet Republics of the Baltics, the Caucasus, and Central Asia
Abstract
The collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) in 1991 created hopes for many, both within the crumbling empire’s borders and in the West, that newly independent ex-republics would make a rapid transition to democratic governance and respect for human rights, including a free press and freedom of
expression. Although almost a quarter-century has passed, those expectations have largely failed to materialise in twelve of the fifteen former SSRs, including all those in Central Asia and the Caucasus. We consider these countries to be “repressitarian”— both repressive in human rights practices and authoritarian in governance (Freedman et al., 2010). The three exceptions are the Baltic countries of Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia.
- Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
- The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
- While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made.The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.